chieftech’s blog

Its not not about the technology 
Filed under

information overload

 

Three reasons why employees like to keep their own personal email archives

I've been working on a magazine article, looking at the failure of both technologies to replace email in the workplace and corporate email archiving solutions. The main theme is about understanding email from a human-centred perspective rather than simply treating email as 'data' to be managed in the most cost effective way possible. The following didn't quite make the cut in my own final edit, but I thought it might be worth sharing it here.
Over the years I’ve heard various reasons why employees like to keep their own personal email archives and they can be separated into three broad groups:
  1. Journaling - a chronology of what happened when and why;
  2. Personal Library - to record important information for future reference; and
  3. Non-repudiation - keeping copies of who said or did what, in case they need to be used as formal or informal evidence of responsibility.
This break down is based on my experiences over the years of working with organisations either implementing or trying to get more value out of existing collaboration and information management tools.

What is particularly interesting for me is that root cause that drives people to use their electronic mail system for the reasons I've listed above isn't always necessarily the same. For example, in some organisations non-repudiation is important because of particularly toxic office politics. But in other cases, users made a rational decision to keep email because of certain professional responsibilities. The lesson here is that when ever we try to ask people to move away from using email (or at least an over reliance on it), we really need to understand why they using email in a certain way and not just focus on the visible behaviours.

Anyway, what kind of strange email hoarding behaviour have you seen and how does it fit into the categories I've described above?

Photo credit: Mr Popular

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   collaboration   email   information overload   technology in the workplace  

Comments [7]

Being Ruthless 2.0

Mark Nash proposes a nice little social media triaging system (Critical > Delayed > Rejected).

It reminds me that I blogged about being ruthless with RSS feeds back in 2007, but since that time the volume and access to different information and activity streams has definitely grown. Unfortunately it is also a reminder that our personal information practices that ultimately define our ability to control information overload continue to lag.

I wrote another piece about living with email, touching on similar issues. While the technologies are different, the common themes are:

  • Information overload is as much a result of poor information managament practices as it is about the volume of information created by the technology.
  • Individuals can't deal with information overload on their own, it requires collective effort (there are a number of dimensions to this).

Unfortunately, at least in an organisational context, until we start taking information work more seriously I think many people will continue to find information overload an issue.

In the meantime, remember that its ok to be ruthless with your social activity consumption.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   activity streams   email   information management   information overload   social media  

Comments [1]

Next generation enterprise aggregator from Attensa released

The Attensa StreamServerâ„¢ creates value by:
  • Breaking down information silos by enabling information from separate systems and communities to be found, organized and flow freely throughout your business.
  • Networking knowledge by enabling people to easily share insight and knowledge with others.
  • Increasing awareness and efficiency by empowering users to benefit from large amounts of information and many interactions as opposed to being overwhelmed.

Attensa have announced the availability of Attensa StreamServer, their next generation enterprise information aggregator. I'm really pleased to see Attensa continue to innovate around this important area and I'll be taking a more detailed look at their new StreamServer product in the near future.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   aggregation   attensa   enterprise 2.0   enterprise social computing   information management   information overload   rss  

Comments [3]

Intent in Social Business Design

We need to stop designing tools and platforms which are simply meant to allow people to connect, share and collaborate more. In doing this we are being incredibly irresponsible with the resource we value most. Instead we need to design for business intent and utilize our efficiencies as tools to help solve real business problems.

Jevon is talking about the risk of new social computing technologies absorbing more of people's attention, rather than helping them to work more effectively. I think people - particularly in a business setting - intuitively recognise this issue. For example, if you are already working 60 hours week and addicted to your Blackberry, do you really want to add Yammer (a corporate Twitter-style platform) to that mix?

Of course, the point is that we don't actually want to add to (or overload) people's attention quota - instead we want to substitute. Here I think there is a misunderstanding about the 'emergent' aspects of social computing tools. Its not about chaos (and therefore more noise, more distractions, etc), but rather a different approach to designing solutions to actual business problems that is enabled by the characteristics of social computing tools. For example, we know from our experiences with enterprise wikis that it is easier for users to work within a loosely pre-defined structure, but we don't need to design every aspect of the information or business process architecture at the beginning.

Similarly, intent in Social Business Design provides that strategic framework. Rather than throwing resources and tools randomly into an organisation, we actually do it with an objective in mind.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   attention   information overload   social business design   strategy  

Comments [0]