chieftech’s blog

Its not not about the technology 
Filed under

government 2.0

 

Community Management and Government 2.0

I'm attending the Australian Community Managers' 3rd Roundtable meeting today, in Canberra.

This morning had a government focus, starting with Craig Thomler who spoke about his experiences of managing communities for the Department of Health & Ageing and then facilitated a discussion covering issues such as the use of advertising, viral and organic communities, moderation and risk management.

I then provided an overview of the community management aspects of the Project 8 Online Engagement Guidelines. As I explained this morning, community management - as a function and as a role - is central to the approach we outlined in the guidelines. So far when I've been speaking about the guidelines, I've really provided just an overview of the whole package of materials and the online engagement framework. This time I had a chance to talk about the chapters 4 and 5 from the Online Engagement Guidelines that cover:

  • Community Management How-To; and
  • Roles and Competencies (and Policies).

I then put some of this theory into context by looking at the Gov 2.0 Taskforce itself and the ALRC pilot as case studies.

Considering all the people and experience in the room today, I was very happy with the feedback to the concepts I described:

This afternoon, @Warlach is talking about his new role at Earth Hour (which is coming up on the 27th March) and later we'll be hearing from Venessa Paech from Lonely Planet.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   canberra   community management   events   government 2.0   social networks  

Comments [0]

Masterclass: Online community engagement for the public sector - 22nd March, 2010 - Canberra

mcbanner.png

We are taking advantage of the fact that Robin Hamman will be here in Sydney for our Social Business Summit to run a special half-day masterclass in Canberra on Monday 22nd March.

Featuring Robin and facilitated by Anne Bartlett-Bragg, the masterclass will address:

  • How existing government activities can be undertaken with more impact, wider reach, and effectiveness using social media;
  • Who should do it (and who shouldn't);
  • The guidelines and roles a government agency will need; and
  • Measuring success for different stake holders.

Please contact me at james.dellow@headshift.com or call 0414 233711 for more information or if you would like to register for the masterclass.

I'll be taking a bit of back seat at this event, but it will give you the chance to hear from two other very experienced people from the Headshift team. Robin's profile speaks for itself, meanwhile you may not be aware that Anne was the other primary author to the Project 8 guidelines I've been talking about a lot recently :-)

Anne was also the lead consultant for Taskforce Project 15, to assist the Australian Law Reform Commission to run an online engagement pilot with their stakeholders.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   canberra   events   government 2.0   headshift  

Comments [0]

The Big Picture of the Internet Filter

Last week, internet activists calling themselves “Anonymous” temporarily brought down the Australian governments’ networks and they’re threatening to do it again. Anonymous, a “hacktivist” group, formed through the subculture website 4Chan. Jon Stewart speaks to 4Chan’s founder Chris “Moot” Poole.

Interesting to note that our 'local' Australian issue with the proposed mandatory Internet filter caught the attention of the BBC's Digital Plant radio show, thanks in part to the DDoS attack by the 'Anonymous' group. The story of the relationship between 4Chan and Anonymous was also something I hadn't heard before. They also discuss the radical idea that, perhaps one day, a DDoS might be seen as a legitimate form of protest - at least, they argue, there are no broken windows at the end of it.

Personally, I think the filter is a waste of time for all the technical reasons people have been talking about (like private dark nets) and I hope, if the legislation is successful, that we don't see dramatic changes to cost and speed of Internet access. However, I'm much more concerned about the risk of scope creep and the message this sends to other nations about freedom of speech.

In that respect I'm happier with Kate Lundy's position that:

"legislating to protect the presence and availability of an open Internet service would clearly solve several of the public concerns whilst also showing the world that Australia takes freedom of speech and association very seriously."
Kate also points to Chris Zappone's piece in the SMH where he says:
While no one would claim the intention of Australia's filtering is political, on a technical level it puts the country in the ranks of some unseemly company, and in the process helps legitimise a heavy-handed government approach.

In fact, industry sources say that democratic governments' seeking of restrictions on searches and web access encourage repressive governments to ask for the same.

This isn't a local issue. In our attempts to protect one group, we actually contribute to putting others at harm.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   government 2.0   internet filter  

Comments [0]

My interview with Anne Faulkner from UK online centres at BarCamp Canberra 2010

It was a really pleasant surprise to find Anne Faulkner, from the UK's online centres, here in Australian and attending BarCamp Canberra 2010. Anne is a champion for digital inclusion in the UK and does it in a way that I don't think I've seen anyone do here in Australia just yet.

Anne Faulkner, Head of Policy and Business Development for the UK online centres network, kindly agreed to share her observations from BarCamp Canberra 2010 about the differences between the UK and Australia in terms of social innovation and digital inclusion.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   barcamp   canberra   digital divide   digital inclusion   government 2.0   social innovation  

Comments [0]

Web accessibility vs information accessibility for Government 2.0

I find the issue of Web site accessibility - particularly as part of the Gov 2.0 conversation - an interesting one. Personally I tend to look at it from the broader perspective of digital inclusion/exclusion, rather than just the mechanics of making the HTML mark up of a Web site accessible as such. WCAG 2.0 for example looks at both the mark up and the content, which makes a lot of sense in theory.

Lets now look at 'accessibility' in practice:

Now I know I'm probably going to lose a lot of karma points for mentioning this, but I couldn't help noticing a few things on the Vision Australia site.

For a start, this rather odd breadcrumb trail I came across at one point:

This was just one a number of navigational inconsistencies I came across. I also had a lot of trouble finding their RSS feed, until I stumbled back on to the home page (its not on the news pages itself and there is no auto-discovery).

And don't get me started on the lack of human friendly URLs... like http://www.visionaustralia.org/info.aspx?page=823&news=1578

Now, there is no doubt that their WCMS is probably at fault for some of these problems, but isn't it shame that such a leading example of an accessible site falls down in other areas that affect the overall user experience and the ability to access the information in it?

RSS is a particular bug bear with me as it is constantly forgotten by government organisations at all levels, but it is the corner stone of making new information easily syndicated out beyond the confines of a particular Website. I mention this because if government agencies see this as a model example, then I think they will still fail in their overall ability to deliver Government 2.0. Yes, Web accessibility itself is important - but so is information accessibility too if we are going to progress along the path of achieving full inclusion and participation. 

I think that when we talk about accessibility for Government 2.0, we should be aiming for:
  • Highest possible standards of Web accessibility (mark up and content);
  • Best possible user experience; and
  • Baked in support for content syndication and access to the PSI the site contains.
BTW As someone without vision problems (other than being a little short sighted) I do appreciate the fact that overall I have the advantage across the Web and it is very easy for me to be critical. However, the whole reason I was on the Vision Australia site was to check out the kinds of courses they run on Web accessibility. So, help me get some karma points back now by checking out their training courses and maybe even signing up for one. :-)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   government 2.0   public sector information   web accessibility  

Comments [0]

Is it time Government 2.0 + Enterprise 2.0 got together?

In the aftermath of the Gov 2.0 Taskforce that wrapped up in December, I've been watching the sudden realisation by people that achieving Government 2.0 will take more than just a veneer of social media on the outside and 'culture change' within the public service.

This is a good thing, as I actually think some of the definitions of Government 2.0 have been too restrictive in terms of reaching the longer term outcome. They have (quite rightly in many respects) been very focused on the outward open government agenda, the need for online engagement and the benefits of access to public sector information. This missing ingredient for me is about actually changing how people inside the agencies work together and how they are organised, so they can meet the new demands of Government 2.0. And of course all without changing some of the fundamental principles that good government is based on.

Now to me this is all about Social Business Design, although you might prefer to think of it as combining Government 2.0 with Enterprise 2.0. Perhaps someone can come up with a nicer word for that?

Photo credit: Out of Office

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   enterprise 2.0   government 2.0   social business design  

Comments [0]

Gov 2.0 and Social Innovation at Barcamp Canberra 2010 #bcc2010

This is a montage of short clips filmed (using my Flip video camera) at Barcamp Canberra 2010, which explores some of the themes of Government 2.0 and Social Innovation from the day.

BTW My slides from Barcamp ('Remixing Gov 2.0' and 'Hello. My Name is, Social Business Design.') and the session I ran on Gov 2.0 on Friday (which is really the extended version of my Barcamp presentation) are also all available online.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   barcamp   bcc2010   canberra   events   government 2.0   presentations   video  

Comments [0]

Gov 2.0 and what it means for federal government departments - Canberra 5/2 @ 2pm

What is Government 2.0 all about? And how can Knowledge Management help staff in government agencies to meet its objectives?

The Federal Government sponsored Government 2.0 Taskforce presented its final report at the end of 2009 - see http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/gov20taskforcereport/index.html

As part of the Taskforce's consultation process, they commissioned the creation of Online Engagement Guidelines and a Web 2.0 Toolkit. This was designed to provide guidance to government agencies using web 2.0 tools and provided a recommendation for a toolkit of web 2.0 technologies that agencies can use based on principles of shared services and re-use.

James Dellow will provide a briefing on:
* The Government 2.0 Taskforce
* An overview of the new Online Engagement Guidelines and Web 2.0 Toolkit
* How you can make use of it
* How your Knowledge Management skills and practices can contribute to enabling Government 2.0

James will then facilitate an open discussion on the topic, using a conversation cafe style format.

Thanks to the ACT KM community and Brad Hinton at AusAID, I'm taking advantage of the fact that I'm down in Canberra this weekend for BarCamp Canberra by running this session tomorrow (Friday) about Government 2.0, with a focus on the Online Engagement Guidelines I helped to write for Taskforce Project 8.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   canberra   events   government 2.0   knowledge management   knowledge sharing  

Comments [0]

Taking Gov 2.0 beyond the iPhone-wielding, Twitter-tweeting community

In 2010, the Gov 2.0 community needs to think harder about how this movement will bridge economic disparity. Open data, open source, social media, transparency and collaboration are great, but look around the room at the people it serves and ask yourself, ‘how is this bridging the digital divide?’

I’m not saying Gov 2.0 isn’t accomplishing this on some scale. I’m saying there needs to be more of a conscious effort to do so. There needs to be consideration as to how this is catering to more than just the iPhone-wielding, Twitter-tweeting community, or we risk further alienating those who need government most.

An important point. Its something I've talked about back at the Public Spheres on Government 2.0 in Canberra and Sydney. However, its also important to remember that Government 2.0 doesn't need to save the world - it just need to contribute to help saving lots of little bits of the world in ways that really count. Its one reason why Patient Opinion continues to be one of my favourite case studies for meaningful Government 2.0.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   case studies   government 2.0   healthcare   public sphere  

Comments [3]

Realising Our Broadband Future - 10th-11th Dec

The National Broadband Network (NBN) will turbo-charge our digital economy and enable Australia to become a global leader in using the online world - the world of the 21st century. It will make possible new ways of delivering all essential services.

We need to start planning now for this new world to ensure we maximise the opportunities that the National Broadband Network will provide.

The Government is hosting the Realising Our Broadband Future forum to map the applications and business models that will thrive in Australia's high speed broadband future.

The Prime Minister, the Hon. Kevin Rudd MP, will open the forum and a number of key speakers, including NBN Co. CEO, Mike Quigley and Jeff Cole, Director USC Annenberg School, will outline the potential of the NBN for Australia's digital economy. The forum will be co-chaired by Dr Paul Twomey and participants will include leaders from all parts of Australia.

Participants will contribute to five discussion streams. Over two days, these streams will debate the possible new applications and business models that will emerge in an NBN-enabled world, conduct a reality check of where we are now, and map what needs to be done to take full advantage of our high-speed broadband enabled digital economy.

Forum participants and the general public can contribute to the discussion via twitter and collaboratively edit the map of our next steps. Plenary sessions of the forum will be webcast live, with audio streaming of other sessions.

Talking of the fact the government is already making attempts to engage online, the next big online engagement is the Realising Our Broadband Future forum later this week.

Unfortunately I'm still working on Taskforce Project 8 and won't be able to attend, but I'll be keep an eye on proceedings. Even if you can't participate on the day (in person or online), you can still get involved by submitting and voting on ideas (although I think you'll need a Google account since they are using Google Moderator).

The model for this event has been strongly influenced by Sen. Kate Lundy's Public Sphere approach.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   events   government 2.0   national broadband network   public sphere  

Comments [0]